SAT order in the matter of M/s. Gulab Impex Enterprises Limited

Facts: The present appeal is filed by M/s.Gulab Impex Enterprises Limited (“Appellant”) against the initiation of Adjudication proceeding by SEBI and imposed a penalty of Rs. 9,00,000 for violation of Regulation 8(3) of SEBI (SAST) Regulations, 1997 instead of favourably considering the consent application for an amicable resolution of the issue. 

Brief facts of the case: 
  • Gulab Impex Enterprises Limited (“Appellant”) is a company incorporated under Companies Act, 1956 and the shares of the Company are listed at Delhi Stock Exchange Limited and UP Stock Exchange Limited. 
  • Appellant had failed to file the disclosures as required under Regulation 8(3) of SEBI (SAST) Regulations, 1997 for the year 1998 to 2011. Accordingly SEBI imposed the penalty of 9,00,000 for the aforesaid violations on the Appellant. Being aggrieved by the direction of SEBI, the appellant has filed the appeal before Hon’ble Tribunal and contended the following: 
  • The two stock exchanges, where the shares of the companyare listed, namely, Delhi Stock Exchange and UP Stock Exchange, are nonfunctionaland no trading is being carried on by the investors or shareholders in the scrip of theappellant company since last many years. 
  • They had been disclosing regularly the shareholdings under Regulation 8(3) of SEBI (SAST) Regulations, 1997. However, in respect of 2001 there was an inadvertent noncompliance. It was revealed to them by the company secretary and they tookimmediate steps to approach SEBI by disclosing the violation. SEBI instead offavorably considering the consent application for an amicable resolution of the issue, conducted adjudication proceedings and passed the impugned order in question. 
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed by the SEBI is justified?

Decision: After taking into considerations all the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal (“SAT”) observed that the appellant on his own approached SEBI on becoming aware of the technical violation in question and asked for consent proceedings which, somehow, could not materialize. SAT further observed that the conduct of appellant in approaching SEBI on its own and thereby bringing the violation in question to the notice of SEBI. 

As against the above order passed by SEBI, after considering all mitigating factors, SAT held that ends of justice would be met with by disposing of this appeal and directed Appellant to make disclosure as per Regulation 8(3) of SEBI (SAST) Regulation, 1997 on or before November 17, 2014 and after the required disclosure is made by the Appellant, the penalty of Rs. 9 lacs imposed on the appellant shall stand modified to Rs. 5 lacs. In case the appellant does not make appropriate disclosure by November 17, 2014, the original penalty against the company shall revive.

This SAT order is a part of Takeover Panorama Nov- Dec 2014 which is embedded below:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Leaves & Holidays under Indian Labour & Employment Laws

Image
Holidays and Leaves of workers in India are governed principally by the Factory Act, 1948 and state shops and establishment acts. Weekend Holidays Mr. Pankaj Singla Sr. Associate +919971508320 pankaj@indiacp.com In India, the law prescribes maximum number of hours a week a worker may not be employed beyond. An adult worker shall not be employed for more than 48 (forty eight) hours in a week and not more than 9 (nine) hours in a day. Weekly holiday is compulsory as per the Factories Act. First day of the week i.e. Sunday shall be a weekly holiday. The employer has to make sure that no worker works more than 10 days without a rest day of 24 hours. Therefore, if the worker is asked to work on weekly
Click to read more »

SEBI's Circulars About Enhancing Liquidity And Curbing Manipulation Regarding Illiquid Scrips

Image
SEBI recently has come out with two different circulars in respect to illiquid scrips wherein one circular talks about enhancing liquidity in the illiquid scrips by promoting incentives by stock exchanges on trading in such scrips, another circular aims at curbing manipulations in the illiquid scrips by introducing Periodic Call Auction in illiquid scrips. Ms. Deepika Vijay Sawhney Partner +919818316936 deepika@indiacp.com The definition of illiquid scrips is kept different in both the circulars with the definition being much wider in case of scrips qualifying for Periodic Call Auctions. The provisions of both the circulars are discussed in detail hereunder: 1. Introduction of Liquidity Enhancement Scheme for illiquid scrips in Equity Cash Market by Circular dated February 08, 2013:
Click to read more »

Work Hours and Overtime under the Factory Act, 1948 and Shops & Establishment Act

Image
India has two major laws concerning working hours of workers i.e. the Factory Act, 1948 and Shops & Establishment Act. The regulations related to the working hours can be separated into four broad categories that help demarcate the dimensions of the discussion. Working Hours for Factory Workers; I. Employment of Adults: Mr. Pankaj Singla Sr. Associate +919971508320 pankaj@indiacp.com An adult worker shall not be employed for more than 48 (forty eight) hours in a week and not more than 9 (nine) hours in a day. A compulsory rest of at least half an hour (30 minutes) between each period of work  and such period of work shall not exceed five hours. Total period of work inclusive of rest interval cannot be more than 10.5 hours. The Chief Inspector may by giving a reason in writing  increase the workday time up to twelve hours. According to Minimum Wages Act, 1948 the working day of a worker shall be so arranged that inclusive of the interval of rest it shall n...
Click to read more »